Subject: RE: [Patch v1 1/3] bugreport.c: replace strbuf_write_fd with write_in_full

From: "Randall S. Becker" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 13:17:19 -0400

On June 19, 2020 12:36 PM, Đoàn Trần Công Danh wrote:
> On 2020-06-19 11:04:43-0400, [email-masked] wrote:
> > From: "Randall S. Becker" <[email-masked]>
> >
> > The strbuf_write_fd method did not provide checks for buffers larger
> > than MAX_IO_SIZE. Replacing with write_in_full ensures the entire
> > buffer will always be written to disk or report an error and die.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Randall S. Becker <[email-masked]>
> > ---
> >  bugreport.c | 5 ++++-
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/bugreport.c b/bugreport.c index aa8a489c35..bc359b7fa8
> > 100644
> > --- a/bugreport.c
> > +++ b/bugreport.c
> > @@ -174,7 +174,10 @@ int cmd_main(int argc, const char **argv)
> >  		die(_("couldn't create a new file at '%s'"), report_path.buf);
> >  	}
> >
> > -	strbuf_write_fd(&buffer, report);
> > +	if (write_in_full(report, buffer.buf, buffer.len) < 0) {
> > +		die(_("couldn't write report contents '%s' to file '%s'"),
> > +			buffer.buf, report_path.buf);
> 
> Doesn't this dump the whole report to the stderr?
> If it's the case, the error would be very hard to grasp.

Where else can we put the error? By this point, we're likely out of disk or virtual memory.

> Nit: We wouldn't want the pair of {}.
> 
> > +	}
> >  	close(report);

I'm not sure what you mean in this nit? {} are balanced. You mean in the error message?

Randall