Subject: Re: Intermittent failures in t9119

From: "David D. Kilzer" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 06:13:56 -0800 (PST)

Eric Wong <[email-masked]> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]> wrote:
> > Eric  Wong <[email-masked]>  writes:
> > > Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]> wrote:
> >  >>  (2) Nobody uses the value from "Text Last Updated" field in  practice, 
>so
> > >>      that bug has been unnoticed so  far;
> > >> 
> > >>  (3) And it is not worth fixing it  ;-)
> > >> 
> > >> For now, I would suggest fixing the  failing test to ignore the "Text 
Last
> > >> Updated" field while  comparing, and if somebody is inclined to, we would
> > >> update the  code to match what "svn info" does.
> > >
> > > Agreed on both  points.  I consider "git svn log" and "git svn info" to
> > > be  reasonable approximations of svn behavior, not exact replicas.
> > >  Exactly matching would be extremely difficult given variations between
> >  > different svn versions, and also svn requiring network access while
> >  > git svn does not.
> > 
> > Ok, here is a minimum patch to do  that.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
> 
> Thanks,  Acked-by: Eric Wong <[email-masked]>

Acked-by: David Kilzer <[email-masked]>

Thanks!

Dave