Subject: Re: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark

From: Tom Lord <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:54:19 -0700 (PDT)

> Call me a naive git, but seems to me the "git way" is a little
  > different. It's tree-based rather than diff-based, and doesn't involve
  > passing diffs around, right?

Isn't that a significant part of what I said?  Go back and read more
carefully, is my suggestion.

  > Or am I missing something?

Very much so.

-t