Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Support for SSL client cert

From: Nick Hengeveld <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:15:42 -0700

On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:43:39PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> That is a valid concern.
> 
> Anoter possibility is to read them from the environment, since
> we already do SSL_NO_VERIFY from there.

Good point - use of environment variables is more consistent.  Use of
command-line arguments is a bit more convenient in my case since I'm
driving the transfer from a perl script, but I suppose consistency is
more important...

-- 
For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for nature cannot be fooled.