Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a".

From: Jakub Narebski <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:58:09 +0100

Dnia czwartek 30. listopada 2006 22:50, Carl Worth napisał:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:41:37 -0800, "Michael K. Edwards" wrote:
>>
>> git mark
> 
> I actually thought of that. But compared to "refresh" it sounds more
> like something that suggests marking a file path rather than copying
> contents, so our dark lord might not approve of the wrong ideas it
> might allow to persist in brain-damaged heads.
> 
> It is nice and short, which is a bonus though.

What about "git update"? "git add" would also work, I think.
-- 
Jakub Narebski