Subject: Re: MinGW port usable

From: "Shawn O. Pearce" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:18:03 -0500

Johannes Schindelin <[email-masked]> wrote:
> On the git repository, using MinGW:
> Using cygwin:
> 
> IOW MinGW wins hands down with an average 0.33s vs cygwin with an average 
> 0.75s. (I am fairly certain that you must not trust sys times.)

Just curious, but were these tests run with mmap(), or NO_MMAP?

Clearly, for a packed repository most of the overhead should be
in getting to the pack data itself (as everything else is pure
userspace).

-- 
Shawn.