Subject: Re: [3/4] What's not in 1.5.2 (new topics)

From: Andy Parkins <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:36:00 +0100

On Friday 2007 May 18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

> Why is that? Content is what is important.  URLs are only a convenience
> measure to help clients find the content.  The link must have a commit
> hash, so git can *verify* that the content is correct. Where it comes from
> must be irrelevant.
>
> So if someone looks at my tree, and does not know where to get the content,
> he might want my hint on this.

True.  Hannes also pointed out that the trust comes from the hash contained in 
the gitlink that is in tree, there is no need to assign trust to the URL.

I withdraw my objection.

Andy

-- 
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET
[email-masked]