Subject: Re: [VOTE] git versus mercurial (for DragonflyBSD)

From: Jakub Narebski <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:57:36 +0100

On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, 0000 vk wrote:
> 2008/10/27 Jakub Narebski <[email-masked]>

> > By the way, going back to the matter of choosing version control
> > system for DragonflyBSD; some time ago I have written post
> >  * "Mercurial's only true "plugin" extension: inotify...
> >    and can it be done in Git?"
> >   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/76661
> >   (current answer: it is possible using 'assume unchanged' bit)
> > about how nearly every Mercurial extension has equivalent functionality
> > in Git.
> >
> > But what about the reverse, about the following features and
> > issues in Mercurial:
[...]

> 
> Jakub,
> 
> Do you know if git supports the equivalent of hg bundle?
> Thanks.

The equivalent of "hg bundle" (http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/hg.1.html#bundle)
would be "git bundle" (http://git.or.cz/man/git-bundle). I think
git-bundle was inspired by Mercurial feature, just like fast-import
format and bisect went in other direction.

P.S. Could you _please_ quote only relevant fragments of email you are
replying to, especially if it is so long?

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland