Subject: Re: libgit2 - a true git library

From: "Shawn O. Pearce" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 15:57:14 -0700

Nicolas Pitre <[email-masked]> wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> 
> > My take on the consensus for the license part of the discussion is
> > that libgit2 should be under the "GPL gcc library" license.
> > 
> > BTW, I can't actually find a copy of that license; the only thing
> > I can locate in the GCC SVN tree is a copy of the LGPL.
> 
> The exception is usually found at the top of files constituting 
> libgcc.a.  One example is gcc/config/arm/ieee754-df.S.  ;-)

Headers updated.  Its now GPL+gcc library exception.

Not that the 5 lines of useful code there really needs copyright,
but hey, whatever.

-- 
Shawn.