Subject: Re: git init permissions?

From: Jan Krüger <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:40:24 +0200

Hi,

On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:09:50 +0200, "Ferry Huberts (Pelagic)"
<[email-masked]> wrote:

> Is there some kind of reason that the branches directory is
> not created with +s permissions?

Probably because it isn't really used anymore. It's more like a
historical artifact. Branch refs actually live in refs/heads/ and the
like (or in the packed-refs file).

-Jan