Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2010, #01; Sat, 4)

From: Yann Dirson <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 09:21:22 +0100

On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:13:46 +0900
Miles Bader <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Yann Dirson <[email-masked]> writes:
> > But then, why not simply use --find-renames (since --detect-renames
> > has luckily not been released ontl the masses yet), and avoid
> > making similar-usage opts dissimilar and then adding a synonym just
> > to make them similar the other way ?
> 
> "Find" and "detect" have different nuances.
> 
> "Detect" sounds somewhat passive/minor, so "detect renames" makes it
> more clear that renames are detected _in addition_ to normal
> processing.

Seen that argument before.
1. does anyone care ? (I personally don't)
2. whether we care or not we have IMHO to face the implications, see my
other mails about implications of both paths

-- 
Yann Dirson - Bertin Technologies