Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] revert: decouple sequencer actions from builtin commands

From: Jonathan Nieder <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 14:48:15 -0600

Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>>> Jonathan Nieder wrote:

>>>> So what change does the patch actually make?  Is this a renaming?
>>>
>>> Yes, it renames "action" to "command" where appropriate.
>>
>> Wouldn't a simple renaming have a diffstat with the same number of added
>> and removed lines?
>
> Yes, almost.  A few extra lines added because I needed a new data enum
> for the "command"; also added a convenience function: action_name().

It's not a simple renaming, then.

What user-visible effect will this have, if any?  What programmer-visible
effect will it have, if any?  I _really_ should not have to read the patch
to learn the impact of a patch.