Subject: Re: Millisecond precision in timestamps?

From: "Eric S. Raymond" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:04:19 -0500

Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>:
> fsck_ident() in fsck.c rejects anything but " [1-9][0-9]* " after
> the author and committer ident (i.e. the timestamp has to be
> integral number of seconds since the epoch, not before it, nor
> with fractional seconds).

Is this architecturally significant?  It sounds like another
implementation detail.
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>