Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 00/13] the refs-transactions-reflog series

From: Jonathan Nieder <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 11:27:20 -0800

Stefan Beller wrote:

> Ok, let's see how Michaels series evolves and if I can base the
> transactions series
> on that

That sounds good to me, too, FWIW.  That way we don't have to fuss
with conflicts in refs.c. :)

Thanks,
Jonathan