Subject: Re: [RFC/WIP PATCH 05/11] transport: add infrastructure to support a protocol version number

From: Jeff King <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 02:39:25 -0400

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 03:01:09PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:

> +	OPT_STRING('y', "transport-version", &transport_version,
> +		   N_("transport-version"),
> +		   N_("specify transport version to be used")),

Interesting choice for the short option ("-v" would be nice, but
obviously it is taken). Do we want to delay on claiming the
short-and-sweet 'y' until we are sure this is something people will use
a lot? In an ideal world, it is not (i.e., auto-upgrade and other tricks
become good enough that nobody bothers to specify it manually).

-Peff