Subject: [PATCH 1/3] wt-status: implement opportunisitc index update correctly

From: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 11:41:03 -0800

The require_clean_work_tree() function calls hold_locked_index()
with die_on_error=0 to signal that it is OK if it fails to obtain
the lock, but unconditionally calls update_index_if_able(), which
will try to write into fd=-1.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]>
---
 wt-status.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/wt-status.c b/wt-status.c
index a2e9d332d8..a715e71906 100644
--- a/wt-status.c
+++ b/wt-status.c
@@ -2258,11 +2258,12 @@ int has_uncommitted_changes(int ignore_submodules)
 int require_clean_work_tree(const char *action, const char *hint, int ignore_submodules, int gently)
 {
 	struct lock_file *lock_file = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*lock_file));
-	int err = 0;
+	int err = 0, fd;
 
-	hold_locked_index(lock_file, 0);
+	fd = hold_locked_index(lock_file, 0);
 	refresh_cache(REFRESH_QUIET);
-	update_index_if_able(&the_index, lock_file);
+	if (0 <= fd)
+		update_index_if_able(&the_index, lock_file);
 	rollback_lock_file(lock_file);
 
 	if (has_unstaged_changes(ignore_submodules)) {
-- 
2.11.0-274-g0631465056