Subject: Re: [PATCH] real_path: make real_path thread-safe

From: Brandon Williams <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 14:13:35 -0800

On 12/07, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Torsten Bögershausen <[email-masked]> writes:
> 
> > But in any case it seems that e.g.
> > //SEFVER/SHARE/DIR1/DIR2/..
> > must be converted into
> > //SEFVER/SHARE/DIR1
> >
> > and 
> > \\SEFVER\SHARE\DIR1\DIR2\..
> > must be converted into
> > \\SEFVER\SHARE\DIR1
> 
> Additional questions that may be interesting are:
> 
>     //A/B/../C		is it //A/C?  is it an error?
>     //A/B/../../C/D	is it //C/D?  is it an error?
> 

Also is //.. the same as //?  I would assume so since /.. is /

-- 
Brandon Williams