Subject: [PATCH] name-rev: use larger timestamp for is_better_name

From: Eric Wong <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 20:36:49 +0000

This fixes t4202 for me at "44 - log --graph with full output"
on 32-bit x86.

Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <[email-masked]>
---
 This is for pu, I'm still using the machine I used git with in 2005 :)

 builtin/name-rev.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/builtin/name-rev.c b/builtin/name-rev.c
index f06498524..35409c03b 100644
--- a/builtin/name-rev.c
+++ b/builtin/name-rev.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static const char *prio_names[] = {
 
 static int is_better_name(struct rev_name *name,
 			  const char *tip_name,
-			  unsigned long taggerdate,
+			  timestamp_t taggerdate,
 			  int generation,
 			  int distance,
 			  int from_tag)
-- 
EW