Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] t4061: use POSIX compliance regex(7)

From: Danh Doan <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 08:52:33 +0700

On 2020-03-22 07:55:10+0700, Đoàn Trần Công Danh <[email-masked]> wrote:
> BRE interprets `+` literally, and
> `\+` is undefined for POSIX BRE, from:
> https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap09.html#tag_09_03_02
> 
> > The interpretation of an ordinary character preceded
> > by an unescaped <backslash> ( '\\' ) is undefined, except for:
> > - The characters ')', '(', '{', and '}'
> > - The digits 1 to 9 inclusive
> > - A character inside a bracket expression
> 
> This test is failing with busybox sed, the default sed of Alpine Linux
> 
> Fix it by using literal `+` instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <[email-masked]>

Due to error in my part, please ignore the v2 with 6 patches.
It's the same with v1.

Please look into v2 with 8 patches instead.

Sorry for the noise.

-- 
Danh