Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] [RFC] Maintenance jobs and job runner

From: Jonathan Nieder <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 08:03:40 -0700

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder <[email-masked]> writes:

>>                              The real question is, do we consider the
>> existing "git gc" infrastructure such a lost cause that we should
>> touch it as little as possible?
>
> I am fine with that, as long as the "new" thing will take over what
> "git gc" currently does.

Good reminder, thank you.

Yes, as long as we end up replacing the old thing, making a parallel
new thing (e.g. with a config option for switching between during a
transition period) can be a fine approach.

Thanks,
Jonathan