Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] SHA-256 CVS and SVN patches

From: Eric Wong <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 00:21:11 +0000

"brian m. carlson" <[email-masked]> wrote:
> The patches are ordered roughly with test-only fixes, then SVN, and then
> CVS.  There are no additional tests here because everything fails with
> SHA-256 before and passes afterwards.

Thanks brian.  I took a quick look at this series (including the
CVS stuff) and nothing objectionable jumped out(*).

Consider this series Acked-by: me

(*) except perhaps some of my original code :x
    which I hope to fix at some point this year