public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail•com>
To: Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail•com>
Cc: git@vger•kernel.org,
	Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx•de>,
	Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm•org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] rebase -r: don't write .git/MERGE_MSG when fast-forwarding
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 19:26:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210817172609.GB2257957@szeder.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01d5ed4cba04d69e484d2c040635632df914bfa6.1628860053.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 01:07:32PM +0000, Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget wrote:
> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm•org.uk>
> 
> When fast-forwarding we do not create a new commit so .git/MERGE_MSG
> is not removed and can end up seeding the message of a commit made
> after the rebase has finished. Avoid writing .git/MERGE_MSG when we
> are fast-forwarding by writing the file after the fast-forward
> checks.
> 
> Note that the way this change is implemented means we no longer write
> the author script when fast-forwarding either. I believe this is safe
> for the reasons below but it is a departure from what we do when
> fast-forwarding a non-merge commit. If we reword the merge then 'git
> commit --amend' will keep the authorship of the commit we're rewording
> as it ignores GIT_AUTHOR_* unless --reset-author is passed. It will
> also export the correct GIT_AUTHOR_* variables to any hooks and we
> already test the authorship of the reworded commit. If we are not
> rewording then we no longer call spilt_ident() which means we are no
> longer checking the commit author header looks sane. However this is
> what we already do when fast-forwarding non-merge commits in
> skip_unnecessary_picks() so I don't think we're breaking any promises
> by not checking the author here.

Thanks you for fixing this bug.

FWIW (not that much, I'm afraid), I think your reasoning about the
harmlessness of the behavior change concerning the author script makes
sense.

My only nit is that the movement of a ~40 lines block of code makes
out the bulk of the patch; perhaps it would be worth mentioning it
explicitly in the commit message, so future readers of this commit
won't look for changes in those hunks.

> Reported-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail•com>
> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm•org.uk>
> ---
>  sequencer.c     | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  t/lib-rebase.sh | 10 ++++--
>  2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index cc8a361cceb..c2cba5ed4b1 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -983,7 +983,8 @@ static int run_git_commit(const char *defmsg,
>  
>  	cmd.git_cmd = 1;
>  
> -	if (is_rebase_i(opts) && read_env_script(&cmd.env_array)) {
> +	if (is_rebase_i(opts) && !(!defmsg && (flags & AMEND_MSG)) &&
> +	    read_env_script(&cmd.env_array)) {
>  		const char *gpg_opt = gpg_sign_opt_quoted(opts);
>  
>  		return error(_(staged_changes_advice),
> @@ -3815,6 +3816,45 @@ static int do_merge(struct repository *r,
>  		goto leave_merge;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If HEAD is not identical to the first parent of the original merge
> +	 * commit, we cannot fast-forward.
> +	 */
> +	can_fast_forward = opts->allow_ff && commit && commit->parents &&
> +		oideq(&commit->parents->item->object.oid,
> +		      &head_commit->object.oid);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If any merge head is different from the original one, we cannot
> +	 * fast-forward.
> +	 */
> +	if (can_fast_forward) {
> +		struct commit_list *p = commit->parents->next;
> +
> +		for (j = to_merge; j && p; j = j->next, p = p->next)
> +			if (!oideq(&j->item->object.oid,
> +				   &p->item->object.oid)) {
> +				can_fast_forward = 0;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		/*
> +		 * If the number of merge heads differs from the original merge
> +		 * commit, we cannot fast-forward.
> +		 */
> +		if (j || p)
> +			can_fast_forward = 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (can_fast_forward) {
> +		rollback_lock_file(&lock);
> +		ret = fast_forward_to(r, &commit->object.oid,
> +				      &head_commit->object.oid, 0, opts);
> +		if (flags & TODO_EDIT_MERGE_MSG)
> +			goto fast_forward_edit;
> +
> +		goto leave_merge;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (commit) {
>  		const char *encoding = get_commit_output_encoding();
>  		const char *message = logmsg_reencode(commit, NULL, encoding);
> @@ -3864,45 +3904,6 @@ static int do_merge(struct repository *r,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * If HEAD is not identical to the first parent of the original merge
> -	 * commit, we cannot fast-forward.
> -	 */
> -	can_fast_forward = opts->allow_ff && commit && commit->parents &&
> -		oideq(&commit->parents->item->object.oid,
> -		      &head_commit->object.oid);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * If any merge head is different from the original one, we cannot
> -	 * fast-forward.
> -	 */
> -	if (can_fast_forward) {
> -		struct commit_list *p = commit->parents->next;
> -
> -		for (j = to_merge; j && p; j = j->next, p = p->next)
> -			if (!oideq(&j->item->object.oid,
> -				   &p->item->object.oid)) {
> -				can_fast_forward = 0;
> -				break;
> -			}
> -		/*
> -		 * If the number of merge heads differs from the original merge
> -		 * commit, we cannot fast-forward.
> -		 */
> -		if (j || p)
> -			can_fast_forward = 0;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (can_fast_forward) {
> -		rollback_lock_file(&lock);
> -		ret = fast_forward_to(r, &commit->object.oid,
> -				      &head_commit->object.oid, 0, opts);
> -		if (flags & TODO_EDIT_MERGE_MSG)
> -			goto fast_forward_edit;
> -
> -		goto leave_merge;
> -	}
> -
>  	if (strategy || to_merge->next) {
>  		/* Octopus merge */
>  		struct child_process cmd = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> diff --git a/t/lib-rebase.sh b/t/lib-rebase.sh
> index 99d9e7efd2d..ec6b9b107da 100644
> --- a/t/lib-rebase.sh
> +++ b/t/lib-rebase.sh
> @@ -173,10 +173,16 @@ set_reword_editor () {
>  
>  	write_script reword-editor.sh <<-EOF &&
>  	# Save the oid of the first reworded commit so we can check rebase
> -	# fast-forwards to it
> +	# fast-forwards to it. Also check that we do not write .git/MERGE_MSG
> +	# when fast-forwarding
>  	if ! test -s reword-oid
>  	then
> -		git rev-parse HEAD >reword-oid
> +		git rev-parse HEAD >reword-oid &&
> +		if test -f .git/MERGE_MSG
> +		then
> +			echo 1>&2 "error: .git/MERGE_MSG exists"
> +			exit 1
> +		fi
>  	fi &&
>  	# There should be no uncommited changes
>  	git diff --exit-code HEAD &&
> -- 
> gitgitgadget
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-17 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-13 13:07 [PATCH 0/4] rebase -r: some merge related fixes Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-08-13 13:07 ` [PATCH 1/4] rebase -r: make 'merge -c' behave like reword Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-08-13 13:07 ` [PATCH 2/4] rebase -i: Add another reword test Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-08-13 13:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] rebase -r: don't write .git/MERGE_MSG when fast-forwarding Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-08-17 17:26   ` SZEDER Gábor [this message]
2021-08-19 10:09     ` Phillip Wood
2021-08-13 13:07 ` [PATCH 4/4] rebase -r: fix merge -c with a merge strategy Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-08-14 22:43 ` [PATCH 0/4] rebase -r: some merge related fixes Johannes Schindelin
2021-08-19 10:07   ` Phillip Wood
2021-08-20 15:40 ` [PATCH v2 " Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-08-20 15:40   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] rebase -r: make 'merge -c' behave like reword Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-08-20 15:40   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] rebase -i: Add another reword test Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-08-20 15:40   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] rebase -r: don't write .git/MERGE_MSG when fast-forwarding Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-08-20 15:40   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] rebase -r: fix merge -c with a merge strategy Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2021-08-24 13:33   ` [PATCH v2 0/4] rebase -r: some merge related fixes Johannes Schindelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210817172609.GB2257957@szeder.dev \
    --to=szeder.dev@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx$(echo .)de \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm$(echo .)org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox