Subject: gh

From: Harald Nordgren <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2026 20:07:49 +0200

> I’m not totally opposed to this convenience, but couldn’t we also just teach gh to run set-head as a second command?

We probably could, and maybe we should.

One argument for this new options is that I believe 'git clone' has this
behavior, so it's attractive if forking (adding a secondary remote) could
work in the same way as clone (adding the first remote).

Harald