Subject: Re: [PATCH de.po 5/5] de.po: collection of suggestions

From: Christian Stimming <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 21:42:06 +0200

As one of the earlier translators: I agree with most of those as well. Thanks 
a lot. However, one small remark:

Am Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2012, 15:49:27 schrieb Thomas Rast:
> @@ -676,11 +675,11 @@ msgstr "hinter "
> 
>  #: wt-status.c:908 wt-status.c:911
>  msgid "ahead "
> -msgstr "über "
> +msgstr "weiter: "
> 
>  #: wt-status.c:913
>  msgid ", behind "
> -msgstr ", hinter "
> +msgstr ", zurückgefallen "
> 
>  #: builtin/add.c:62
>  #, c-format
> @@ -903,12 +902,12 @@ msgstr "Zweig '%s' zeigt auf keine Version"
>  #: builtin/branch.c:396
>  #, c-format
>  msgid "behind %d] "
> -msgstr "hinter %d] "
> +msgstr "%d hinterher] "
> 
>  #: builtin/branch.c:398
>  #, c-format
>  msgid "ahead %d] "
> -msgstr "vor %d] "
> +msgstr "%d voraus] "

In the above hunk, you said "ahead = weiter" and "behind = zurückgefallen", 
but now you say "ahead = voraus" and "behind = hinterher". Is it helpful to 
use two different translations, or shouldn't those rather be chosen 
identically? The second set sounds somewhat better to me, but the more 
important question is whether both hunks should use the same translations.

Best Regards,

Christian