From: "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@dwheeler•com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor•apana.org.au>
Cc: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline•com>,
torvalds@osdl•org, rene.scharfe@lsrfire•ath.cx,
git@vger•kernel.org, pasky@ucw•cz
Subject: Re: How to get bash to shut up about SIGPIPE?
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 11:51:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4274FB10.6090600@dwheeler.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1DSDER-0000kS-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
Herbert Xu wrote:
> This issue has been around for years. The discussion that led to
> Debian setting this option may be helpful in understanding it:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=10494
Thanks for the pointer. That discussion points
to some alternative fixes that may be more useful
(instead of installing a repaired shell).
One approach is to install a trap for SIGPIPE in
non-terminating command in a pipeline where the
later items might not process all the data, e.g.:
(trap {} SIGPIPE; find .) | head -1
<rant>
THIS IS A REALLY, REALLY BAD DECISION BY THE BASH TEAM.
Why should the default be "create annoying spurious error report?".
This should at least be a run-time settable option,
with the OPPOSITE default.
</rant>
Which is sad, bash is generally reasonably good.
I guess now I have to say "bash, once properly configured
using DONT_REPORT_SIGPIPE, is reasonably good."
--- David A. Wheeler
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-01 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-28 18:28 How to get bash to shut up about SIGPIPE? Linus Torvalds
2005-04-28 19:03 ` Rene Scharfe
2005-04-28 19:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-28 20:13 ` Rene Scharfe
2005-04-28 20:27 ` Ryan Anderson
2005-04-28 20:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-01 12:07 ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-01 15:51 ` David A. Wheeler [this message]
2005-05-02 16:10 ` Paul Jackson
2005-05-04 2:30 ` David A. Wheeler
2005-05-04 2:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-04 8:26 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-28 21:31 ` Edgar Toernig
2005-04-28 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-29 1:00 ` Joshua T. Corbin
2005-04-30 0:22 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-30 2:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-30 6:29 ` Paul Jackson
2005-04-30 11:04 ` Rene Scharfe
2005-05-02 22:17 ` Paul Jackson
2005-05-02 23:17 ` Petr Baudis
2005-05-03 1:44 ` Paul Jackson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4274FB10.6090600@dwheeler.com \
--to=dwheeler@dwheeler$(echo .)com \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor$(echo .)apana.org.au \
--cc=pasky@ucw$(echo .)cz \
--cc=rene.scharfe@lsrfire$(echo .)ath.cx \
--cc=ryan@michonline$(echo .)com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox