Subject: Re: hared GIT repos (was Re: rsync deprecated but promoted?)

From: A Large Angry SCM <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:36:20 -0700

Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Petr Baudis wrote:
> 
>>The thing is, rsync is bad - it will happily put
>>duplicate, redundant, and especially unwanted data to your repository,
>>especially when the shared GIT repositories happen.
> 
> Speaking of which -- is anybody working on that one?
> 
> I find myself in need of a multiuser shared repository that cannot
> be corrupted (i.e. I want to prevent the users from removing objects,
> and replacing a ref with something that is not a child of the sha1 that's
> already there should also be prevented).
> 

Yes. Actually just the protocol spec so far. Although, progress has been 
interrupted by the process of moving to the SoCal area from Fla.