Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-core-foo -> git-foo, except the core package

From: Andreas Ericsson <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 19:05:41 +0100

Josh Boyer wrote:
> On 11/15/05, H. Peter Anvin <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
>>Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>>>What about "yum remove git" ?  I don't think that will work quite so
>>>well.  The "git" package will be removed just fine since nothing
>>>depends on it, but git-<foo> will still remain.  Maybe not that big of
>>>a deal, but it might not be obvious to some.
>>
>>True.  If you have a solution to that, I'd love to hear it.  Note that
>>having the core package depend on everything else is not acceptable.
> 
> 
> %preun section that does rpm -e of the packages it brings in.  But
> that is a hack that would cause some to become violently ill.  Perhaps
> it's an issue not worth worrying about.
> 

Less puky while bringing some obviousity:

%preun
echo "To get rid of git completely, yada yada (real instructions)."

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   [email-masked]
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231