Subject: Re: Better handling of local changes in 'gitk'?

From: Johannes Sixt <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:33:02 +0200

Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Try this, let me know what you think.  I called the changes in the
> working directory "Local uncommitted changes, not checked in to index"
> and the changes in the index "Local changes checked in to index but
> not committed".  If you prefer some other wording, let me know.

Maybe you go with git-gui's wording:

Index: Staged changes
WD:    Unstaged changes

-- Hannes