Subject: Re: [PATCH] Functions for updating refs.

From: Johannes Sixt <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:08:54 +0200

Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> 
>> Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
>>> On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Carlos Rica wrote:
>>>> +int update_ref_or_die(const char *action, const char *refname,
>>>> +				const unsigned char *sha1,
>>>> +				const unsigned char *oldval, int flags)
>>> Should this not be "void"?  And should it not use update_ref_or_error()?
>> It should not use *_error() directly because then it would print two error
>> messages in a row.
> 
> Well, my idea was to let _error() print the message, and just die().

How do you avoid that die() prints an error, too?

-- Hannes