Subject: Re: how to use git merge -s subtree?

From: David Soria Parra <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 03:28:06 +0100

Sean wrote:
>
> David,
>
> Yes, the reason to start with the "--no-commit" merge is so that the history
> is properly connected once you do the final commit step.  However, I should
> have noted in my original message that none of the steps actually use the
> subtree merge.  Instead they simply prepare a repository such that
> future merging can be done with:
>
>    $ git merge -s subtree B/master.
>
> Cheers,
> Sean

Well yes the history is preserved, but it's not connected to the
subdirectory. So you cannot do git-log B/foo.c as git doesnot know where
to search it as it thinks
it is in /foo.c not in B/foo.c

Cheers