public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ferry Huberts (Pelagic)" <ferry.huberts@pelagic•nl>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
Cc: git@vger•kernel.org, "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce•org>,
	David Aguilar <davvid@gmail•com>,
	Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@web•de>,
	Charles Bailey <charles@hashpling•org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Ensure consistent usage of mergetool.keepBackup in git
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 21:41:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E0F27C.8070203@pelagic.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vljq7dmg2.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ferry Huberts <ferry.huberts@pelagic•nl> writes:
> 
>> In several places merge.keepBackup is used i.s.o.
>> mergetool.keepBackup. This patch makes it all
>> consistent for git
> 
> A silly question.  The above makes it sound as if both merge.keepBackup
> and mergetool.keepBackup are valid, but the latter is preferred, and your
> patch makes things consistent even though without it there is nothing
> broken per-se.
> 
> Is that really is the case?
> 
> Otherwise, perhaps the title and the message should read like this:
> 
>     Fix misspelled mergetool.keepBackup
>     
>     In several places mergetool.keepBackup was misspelled as merge.keepBackup.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Ferry Huberts <ferry.huberts@pelagic•nl>

feel free to change it :-)
imho there has been way too much discussion for such a simple patch.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-11 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-10 19:33 [PATCH v3 1/2] Ensure consistent usage of mergetool.keepBackup in git-gui Ferry Huberts
2009-04-10 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] Ensure consistent usage of mergetool.keepBackup in git Ferry Huberts
2009-04-11 19:23   ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-11 19:41     ` Ferry Huberts (Pelagic) [this message]
2009-04-11 19:44       ` Ferry Huberts (Pelagic)
2009-04-11 20:19         ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-12  7:04           ` Ferry Huberts (Pelagic)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49E0F27C.8070203@pelagic.nl \
    --to=ferry.huberts@pelagic$(echo .)nl \
    --cc=charles@hashpling$(echo .)org \
    --cc=davvid@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=markus.heidelberg@web$(echo .)de \
    --cc=spearce@spearce$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox