Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ls-tree: migrate to parse-options

From: Stephen Boyd <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:28:35 -0800

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> As parse-options infrastructure gives much better per-option help text,
> there is not much point to keep the list of options that can go stale
> in the usage text.
>
> I'd squash this to yours.  Ok?
>

I like this style too. Less usage update patches are better. Thanks.