public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J.H." <warthog19@eaglescrag•net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
Cc: Sylvain Rabot <sylvain@abstraction•fr>, git <git@vger•kernel.org>,
	Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail•com>
Subject: Re: Make Gitweb behave like Apache mod_userdir
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:00:26 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B03391A.90808@eaglescrag.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vskccaf4q.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "J.H." <warthog19@eaglescrag•net> writes:
> 
>> For starters I think overriding the /~<user> (specifically the ~ here)
>> is going to be a bad idea no matter what you do and gives the wrong
>> impression about what / how the request is being responded to.  You
>> might want to try and pick a different delimiter or re-work the rule
>> so that you could have something like:
>>
>> 	http://git.kernel.org/<gitweb urls>
>> 	http://git.kernel.org/user/<gitweb urls>
> 
> I am not objecting but showing my ignorance, but why is it a bad idea to
> allow
> 
> 	http://git.kernel.org/~junio/git.git
> 
> to map to /home/junio/pubilic_git/git.git when
> 
> 	http://www.kernel.org/~junio/index.html
> 
> maps to /home/junio/public_html/index.html already?

I'm not objecting to the mapping, I'm objecting to the use of the ~ 
specifically, since that's the default for mod_userdir - it's more or 
less a race condition waiting to happen with respect to does mod_rewrite 
get to and process it first or does mod_userdir.

Case in point should:

assuming that www.example.com (to get away from the specifics of 
kernel.org) is running gitweb but you also wanted to allow users to show 
their ~/public_html directories then

	http://www.example.org/~junio/

could be ambiguous as to what should / is servicing the url.

Now in reality it should work because of how apache is setup, but I 
would argue it's a bad practice to overload the '~' designator like that 
for use in gitweb specifically.

If you have mod_userdir disabled / not available this isn't an issue, 
but making that assumption might be a bad idea.

- John 'Warthog9' Hawley

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-18  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-15 10:04 Make Gitweb behave like Apache mod_userdir Sylvain Rabot
2009-11-15 21:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-17 13:58   ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-17 15:51     ` Sylvain Rabot
2009-11-17 18:12       ` Jakub Narebski
2009-11-17 19:56         ` Sylvain Rabot
2009-11-17 20:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-17 20:24   ` Sylvain Rabot
2009-11-17 22:10     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-17 22:54       ` Sylvain Rabot
2009-11-17 23:40         ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-17 23:52           ` J.H.
2009-11-17 22:59       ` J.H.
2009-11-17 23:46         ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-17 23:59           ` J.H.
2009-11-18  0:14             ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-18  0:00           ` J.H. [this message]
2009-11-18  0:16         ` Sylvain Rabot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B03391A.90808@eaglescrag.net \
    --to=warthog19@eaglescrag$(echo .)net \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jnareb@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=sylvain@abstraction$(echo .)fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox