Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MinGW: Use pid_t more consequently, introduce uid_t for greater compatibility

From: Johannes Sixt <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:09:20 +0100

Sebastian Schuberth schrieb:
> MinGW: Use pid_t more consequently, introduce uid_t for greater compatibility

Why this? Compatibility with what? What's the problem with the status quo?

-- Hannes