Subject: Re: Better cooperation between checkouts and stashing

From: Markus Elfring <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:55:35 +0100

> Traditionally the right way to do this has been to make a temporary commit
> on the branch, i.e.

I would like to avoid such commits for unfinished content updates. Should the
storage operation be provided by the stash instead for intermediate work results?
Will it happen to forget corresponding clean-up for "temporary" changes that
might be committed too early just to get them stored?

Regards,
Markus