From: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha•warpmail.net>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff•net>
Cc: git@vger•kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] All is too much
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 18:08:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BED7574.4070503@drmicha.warpmail.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100514060612.GA19652@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King venit, vidit, dixit 14.05.2010 08:06:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 04:24:34PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
>> This series introduces --lrbranches and --locals as abbreviations
>> for "HEAD --branches --remotes" (local and remote branches) resp.
>> "HEAD --branches --tags" (local refs).
>
> Thanks. --lrbranches is still a little ugly to me, but it does address
> my concern with --heads, and I don't have a better suggestion.
>
> Patch 4/4 itself looks OK. Did you test each part of the series
> independently, though? It looks like 3/4 tests --lrbranches, which isn't
> introduced until 4/4.
Sheesh. I did test them individually, of course. That is, before
reordering with rebase -i and "fixup!"ing the last one. I probably
squashed them in the wrong order :(
I always get confused by the ordering in the action script, which is
just the reverse of git log --oneline.
I'm sorry I didn't catch this myself, I'll rerebase-eee asap.
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-14 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-01 18:36 [RFD PATCH] revlist/rev-parse: Introduce --heads and --locals revision specifiers Michael J Gruber
2010-05-01 19:42 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-05-01 19:47 ` Michael J Gruber
2010-05-01 19:51 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-05-02 5:00 ` Jeff King
2010-05-02 13:43 ` Michael J Gruber
2010-05-05 3:35 ` Jeff King
2010-05-13 14:24 ` [PATCH 0/4] All is too much Michael J Gruber
2010-05-13 14:24 ` [PATCH 1/4] rev-parse: deprecate use as an option sifter Michael J Gruber
2010-05-14 15:41 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-05-14 18:52 ` Michael J Gruber
2010-05-14 19:01 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-05-14 19:22 ` Michael J Gruber
2010-05-17 14:26 ` Thomas Rast
2010-05-13 14:24 ` [PATCH 2/4] t6018: add tests for rev-list's --branches and --tags Michael J Gruber
2010-05-13 14:24 ` [PATCH 3/4] t6018: make sure all tested symbolic names are different revs Michael J Gruber
2010-05-13 14:24 ` [PATCH 4/4] revlist: Introduce --lrbranches and --locals revision specifiers Michael J Gruber
2010-05-14 6:06 ` [PATCH 0/4] All is too much Jeff King
2010-05-14 16:08 ` Michael J Gruber [this message]
2010-05-14 16:14 ` Git methodology question Akhbari, Farshad
2010-05-14 21:44 ` Chris Packham
2010-05-14 21:54 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-05-14 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] All is too much Michael J Gruber
2010-05-14 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] rev-parse: deprecate use as an option sifter Michael J Gruber
2010-05-14 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] t6018: add tests for rev-list's --branches and --tags Michael J Gruber
2010-05-14 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] t6018: make sure all tested symbolic names are different revs Michael J Gruber
2010-05-14 18:26 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] revlist: Introduce --lrbranches and --locals revision specifiers Michael J Gruber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BED7574.4070503@drmicha.warpmail.net \
--to=git@drmicha$(echo .)warpmail.net \
--cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
--cc=peff@peff$(echo .)net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox