public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric James Michael Ritz <Eric@cybersprocket•com>
To: Thomas Rast <trast@student•ethz.ch>
Cc: git@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: Replacing a Remote Branch
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:52:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C4A011A.40604@cybersprocket.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201007232248.49520.trast@student.ethz.ch>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 07/23/2010 04:48 PM, Thomas Rast wrote:
> Eric James Michael Ritz wrote:
>>   2. I realized I need to perform some ‘destructive’ action like
>>   ‘rebase -i’ or amend the last commit to fix a typo in the message.
>>
>>   3. Then I want to push the changed branch as a replacement.
> [...]
>>     $ git push origin :foo && git push origin foo
>>
>> to replace `foo`.  But is there a shorter way to do this?  I thought
>> that writing something like
>>
>>     $ git push origin +foo:foo
>>
>> may have the intended effect, but I still get a rejection due to a
>> non-fast-forward, so I am likely misunderstanding the purpose of `+`.
>
> Since + overrides the non-ff check, this means that the remote side
> has receive.denyNonFastForwards (see man git-config) enabled (or a
> hook to the same effect).  Deleting and pushing the new branch merely
> defeats this refusal because it is no longer a branch *update*.
>
> You should probably check why and by who receive.denyNonFastForwards
> was set.  Git itself sets it if you use 'git init --shared', so that
> may be one reason.

That’s the reason then, `--shared` was used.

> Note that non-ff updates are generally a bad thing for everyone who
> has work based on the affected branch.

We make it a policy to never base work off individual developer’s
branches precisely for this reason, because we’re often making
cleanups via rebase and such.

Thank you for the answer.

- --
Eric James Michael Ritz
Cyber Sprocket Labs
(843) 225-3830
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMSgEVAAoJEEHUZXw5hMWsu1wIANwTnswKzd0pKub3zms1y2wv
ouv2TRvxvpQhKvVO2r+CjDohdH2BQQIa2FWa8g/bG7fQVvGby1xQkWNJYxypebrh
GHHX3Q4uF6mNIqD+yC4AQNQdEywCDXL4lBqh0Q7Bo+6ZGhUtQIEp1vyWHQeHTLuZ
8NhWd4PwE4z5ssGGKTzzvg2FgkWxtKrNaCVXfPTHpeh51J/Slt0Jfhw/i/zXNlGU
BN0Jlnavhvr5IDbODCNB96KJQue1xLZv+mNNrINlY+TlHwNVyKlq2ui8zvG0vC0K
OwwbOh6HlGV1sPReFfbObu6F9oxz6DMcmdHqNtedQPiAmm38EIuFFTa4H1CiYlM=
=P2Zr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-23 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-23 20:14 Replacing a Remote Branch Eric James Michael Ritz
2010-07-23 20:48 ` Thomas Rast
2010-07-23 20:52   ` Eric James Michael Ritz [this message]
2010-07-24  1:17   ` bill lam
2010-07-24 16:03     ` [PATCH 1/2] Document receive.denyDeleteCurrent Thomas Rast
2010-07-24 16:03       ` [PATCH 2/2] Documentation/git-push: Explain status output in more detail Thomas Rast
2010-07-24 16:07       ` [PATCH v1.1 1/2] Document receive.denyDeleteCurrent Thomas Rast

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C4A011A.40604@cybersprocket.com \
    --to=eric@cybersprocket$(echo .)com \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=trast@student$(echo .)ethz.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox