Subject: Re: [TOY PATCH] test-lib: &&-chaining tester

From: Johannes Sixt <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:25:01 +0200

Am 10/6/2010 10:09, schrieb Matthieu Moy:
> Probably a silly question, but is there any reason why we use these &&
> instead of a "set -e" once and for all?

Because different shells implement different behavior when "set -e" is in
effect and functions, && and || chains, and traps are in the game.

-- Hannes