Subject: Re: Index format v5

From: Robin Rosenberg <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 20:57:08 +0200

Thomas Gummerer skrev 2012-05-03 23.38:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Junio C Hamano <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> Thomas Gummerer <[email-masked]> writes:
>>>    1 nul byte to terminate the filename.
>>>
>>>    A 16-bit 'flags' field split into (high to low bits)
>>>
>>>      1-bit assume-valid flag
>>
>> Is this "assume unchanged"?
>

> I have taken this from the old index format documentation, which
> describes it as assume-valid flag, but I guess it's assume unchanged then.

The bit for "assume unchanged" is called CE_VALID in the code.

-- robin