Subject: Re: libgit2 status

From: Andreas Ericsson <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 09:58:17 +0200

On 10/19/2012 10:13 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ramkumar Ramachandra <[email-masked]> writes:
> 
>> Thiago Farina wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> With some structure like:
>>>
>>> include/git.h
>>> src/git.c
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> whatever.
>>> [...]
>>
>> Junio- is it reasonable to expect the directory-restructuring by 2.0?
> 
> I actually hate "include/git.h vs src/git.c"; you have distinction
> between .c and .h already.
> 

Agreed. The way libgit2 does it is to have "src/tag.[ch]", which are
for internal use, and then "src/include/tag.h" which is the published
version that others can use to write code against the tag library.
src/tag.h always includes src/include/tag.h, so no code needs to be
duplicated, but internal parts of the library can still use lower-
level stuff if it wants to. It's a good compromise when creating a
library from application code and there were no opaque types from
the start.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   [email-masked]
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231

Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and
terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war
on peace.