Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 19/19] refs.c: pass **transaction to commit and have it clear the pointer

From: Michael Haggerty <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:20:12 +0200

On 04/29/2014 08:58 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Michael Haggerty <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> [...]
>> Unless we want to make ref_transaction objects reusable.  [...]
> ACK, but I don't think we need reusable transaction yet. Once the API
> is cleaned up
> it should be reasonably easy to add in the future if we see a need for it.
> Sounds reasonable to you ?

Yes, reusable transaction objects would be pretty straightforward to
retrofit, so I agree that there is no need to implement it now.

Michael

-- 
Michael Haggerty
[email-masked]
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/