Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] address packed-refs speed regressions

From: René Scharfe <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 01:04:53 +0200

Am 05.04.2015 um 20:59 schrieb Jeff King:
> Still, the numbers are promising. Here's are comparisons
> against for-each-ref on torvalds/linux, which has a 218M
> packed-refs file:
>
>    $ time git for-each-ref \
>        --format='%(objectname) %(refname)' \
>        refs/remotes/2325298/ |
>        wc -c
>    44139
>
>    real    0m1.649s
>    user    0m1.332s
>    sys     0m0.304s
>
>    $ time ~peff/git-quick-list refs/remotes/2325298/ | wc -c
>    44139
>
>    real    0m0.012s
>    user    0m0.004s
>    sys     0m0.004s

Sweet numbers. :-P

I'm not familiar with refs.c, but its sheer size alone suggests that it 
won't be easy to integrate this prototype code there. :-/

René