Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] delete_ref(): handle special case more explicitly

From: Michael Haggerty <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 12:17:31 +0200

On 06/08/2015 06:48 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Michael Haggerty <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> delete_ref() uses a different convention for its old_sha1 parameter
>> than, say, ref_transaction_delete(): NULL_SHA1 means not to check the
>> old value. Make this fact a little bit clearer in the code by handling
>> it in explicit, commented code rather than burying it in a conditional
>> expression.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <[email-masked]>
>> ---
>>  refs.c | 7 +++++--
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
>> index b575bb8..f9d87b6 100644
>> --- a/refs.c
>> +++ b/refs.c
>> @@ -2795,10 +2795,13 @@ int delete_ref(const char *refname, const unsigned char *old_sha1,
>>         struct ref_transaction *transaction;
>>         struct strbuf err = STRBUF_INIT;
>>
>> +       /* Treat NULL_SHA1 as "don't care" */
> 
> and by "don't care" you mean we still care about getting it deleted,
> the part we don't care about is the particular sha1 (could be a bogus ref).

Correct. I will to change the comment to

	/*
	 * Treat NULL_SHA1 and NULL alike, to mean "we don't care what
	 * the old value of the reference was (or even if it didn't
	 * exist)":
	 */

to make that clearer.

Michael

-- 
Michael Haggerty
[email-masked]