Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 3/9] for-each-ref: add '--points-at' option

From: Karthik Nayak <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 17:31:21 +0530

On 06/09/2015 12:42 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Is this intended?  I would have expected if I did
>
> 	git for-each-ref --points-at master
>
> I would get refs/heads/master and any other refs that exactly points
> at that commit.
>

Thats to be changed, thanks!

>>
>>   FIELD NAMES
>>   -----------
>> diff --git a/builtin/for-each-ref.c b/builtin/for-each-ref.c
>> index 4d2d024..b9d180a 100644
>> --- a/builtin/for-each-ref.c
>> +++ b/builtin/for-each-ref.c
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>>
>>   static char const * const for_each_ref_usage[] = {
>>   	N_("git for-each-ref [<options>] [<pattern>]"),
>> +	N_("git for-each-ref [--points-at <object>]"),
>>   	NULL
>>   };
>>
>> @@ -17,6 +18,7 @@ int cmd_for_each_ref(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>>   	struct ref_sorting *sorting = NULL, **sorting_tail = &sorting;
>>   	int maxcount = 0, quote_style = 0;
>>   	struct ref_filter_cbdata ref_cbdata;
>> +	memset(&ref_cbdata, 0, sizeof(ref_cbdata));
>>
>>   	struct option opts[] = {
>>   		OPT_BIT('s', "shell", &quote_style,
>> @@ -33,6 +35,9 @@ int cmd_for_each_ref(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>>   		OPT_STRING(  0 , "format", &format, N_("format"), N_("format to use for the output")),
>>   		OPT_CALLBACK(0 , "sort", sorting_tail, N_("key"),
>>   			    N_("field name to sort on"), &parse_opt_ref_sorting),
>> +		OPT_CALLBACK(0, "points-at", &ref_cbdata.filter.points_at,
>> +			     N_("object"), N_("print only tags of the object"),
>> +			     parse_opt_points_at),
>>   		OPT_END(),
>>   	};
>>
>> @@ -54,7 +59,6 @@ int cmd_for_each_ref(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>>   	/* for warn_ambiguous_refs */
>>   	git_config(git_default_config, NULL);
>>
>> -	memset(&ref_cbdata, 0, sizeof(ref_cbdata));
>
> I cannot quite see how this change relates to the addition of the
> new option.
>

Well if we memset() after calling parse_opt_points_at(), we loose all 
the information we would have obtained.
So the memset() is moved to an earlier location.

-- 
Regards,
Karthik