public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mostyn Bramley-Moore <mostynb@opera•com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>
Cc: git@vger•kernel.org, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail•com>,
	"brian m . carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste•net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 0/2] add regex match flags to git describe
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 11:07:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5684FE61.4010701@opera.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqy4cbbh5e.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On 12/31/2015 01:23 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Mostyn Bramley-Moore <mostynb@opera•com> writes:
>
>> OK, brainstorming a bit, how about either of these:
>>
>> 1)
>> --match-pattern-type=<glob|fixed-strings|basic-regexp|extended-regexp|perl-regexp>
>>
>> It's a bit lengthy (maybe --match-type would be sufficient), but I
>> like that the value names are shared with git grep etc option names.
>> And it seems future-proof- if we ever need to support different
>> pattern types for other arguments, a --foo-pattern-type flag could be
>> added and make obvious sense.
>
> Swapping the option key and value may not be a bad idea, but one
> problem that the above does not solve, which I outlined in the
> message you are responding to, is that "match-pattern-type" does not
> give any hint that this is about affecting the match that is done to
> "refs", e.g. you cannot tell in
>
>    $ git mgrep --match-pattern-type=perl-regexp -e foo --refs 'release_*'
>
> if the perl-regexp is to be used for matching branch names or for
> matching the strings the command looks for in the trees of the
> matching branches.

There is a hint: --foo-pattern-type applies only to --foo.

In your mgrep example --match-pattern-type would apply to --match 
patterns only, and if we choose to implement it then --refs-pattern-type 
would apply to --refs patterns only.

eg:
$ git mgrep --match '^foo' --match-pattern-type=perl-regexp --refs 
'release_*' --refs-pattern-type=glob

> Magic pattern annotation like we do for pathspecs Duy raised may not
> be a bad idea, either, and would probably be easier to teach people.
> Just like in Perl "(?i)$any_pattern" is a way to introduce the case
> insensitive match with $any_pattern, we may be able to pick an
> extensible magic syntax and decorate the pattern you would specify
> for matching refnames to tell Git what kind of pattern it is, e.g.
>
>    $ git mgrep -P -e foo --refs '/?glob/release_*'
>
> I am not suggesting that we must use /?<pattern type name>/ prefix
> as the "extensible magic syntax" here--I am just illustrating what
> I mean by "extensible magic syntax".

I hadn't seen the pathspec magic patterns before- interesting.  We could 
possibly share syntax with pathspecs, ie
:(?pattern-options...)pattern

Would this be confusing for commands that already have --perl-regexp 
etc?  What should happen if you specify both --perl-regexp and and a 
different type of pattern like :(glob)foo (error out, I suppose)?


-Mostyn.
-- 
Mostyn Bramley-Moore
TV and Connected Devices
Opera Software ASA
mostynb@opera•com

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-31 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-28 10:30 [PATCH/RFC v2 0/2] add regex match flags to git describe Mostyn Bramley-Moore
2015-12-28 10:30 ` [PATCH/RFC v2 1/2] describe: add option to use perl-compatible regexes with --match Mostyn Bramley-Moore
2015-12-28 10:30 ` [PATCH/RFC v2 2/2] describe: add basic and extended posix regex matching for completeness Mostyn Bramley-Moore
2015-12-28 20:30 ` [PATCH/RFC v2 0/2] add regex match flags to git describe Junio C Hamano
2015-12-29  0:13   ` Mostyn Bramley-Moore
2015-12-29 18:27     ` Junio C Hamano
2015-12-30  9:52       ` Duy Nguyen
2015-12-31  0:08         ` Mostyn Bramley-Moore
2015-12-31  0:00       ` Mostyn Bramley-Moore
2015-12-31  0:23         ` Junio C Hamano
2015-12-31 10:07           ` Mostyn Bramley-Moore [this message]
2016-01-04 17:46             ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-06  1:08               ` Mostyn Bramley-Moore
2016-01-06 12:23                 ` Duy Nguyen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5684FE61.4010701@opera.com \
    --to=mostynb@opera$(echo .)com \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste$(echo .)net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox