Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: say "commits" in the --depth option wording for git-clone

From: Sebastian Schuberth <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 19:22:31 +0100

On 08.01.2016 10:18, Sebastian Schuberth wrote:

> It is not wrong to talk about "revisions" here, but in this context
> revisions are always commits, and that is how we already name it in the
> git-fetch docs. So align the docs by always referring to "commits".

Sorry for the missing sign-off, feel free to amend that in pu:

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <[email-masked]>

-- 
Sebastian Schuberth