Subject: Re: /* compiler workaround */ - what was the issue?

From: Marc Branchaud <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 15:30:29 -0400

On 2016-05-06 02:54 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> I wonder if can we come up with a short and sweet notation to remind
> futhre readers that this "initialization" is not initializing but
> merely squelching warnings from stupid compilers, and agree to use
> it consistently?

Perhaps

	#define COMPILER_UNINITIALIZED_WARNING_INITIALIZER 0

or, for short-and-sweet

	#define CUWI 0

?

:)

		M.