Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 6/6] Unit tests for V2 porcelain status

From: Jakub Narębski <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 17:30:43 +0200

W dniu 2016-07-20 o 00:10, Jeff Hostetler pisze:
> +test_expect_success pre_initial_commit_0 '
> +	printf "## branch: (initial) master\n" >expected &&
> +	printf "?? actual\n" >>expected &&
> +	printf "?? dir1/\n" >>expected &&
> +	printf "?? expected\n" >>expected &&
> +	printf "?? file_x\n" >>expected &&
> +	printf "?? file_y\n" >>expected &&
> +	printf "?? file_z\n" >>expected &&

Why not use heredoc syntax (cat <<\EOF), or prepare a file
with expected output in the testsuite?

-- 
Jakub Narębski