Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: simplify man version

From: Felipe Contreras <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 21:45:20 -0600

Hi,

I noticed this patch landed in "next", but I found a typo:

Felipe Contreras wrote:
> There is no need for us to demand that that they add support for the
> version field when in reality all that is going to happen is that both
> fields are going to be joined.

s/that that/that/

Is there any procedure to fix this? Or is it a small enough issue to leave it
as it is?

-- 
Felipe Contreras