public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail•com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox•com>,
	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail•com>
Cc: git@vger•kernel.org, Jeff King <peff@peff•net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: doc-diff: specify date
Date: Sun, 07 May 2023 20:08:37 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <645859a541f23_4e612944b@chronos.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq8re3inn4.fsf@gitster.g>

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail•com> writes:
> 
> > Otherwise comparing the output of commits with different dates generates
> > unnecessary diffs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail•com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/doc-diff | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> Ahh, it is a fix for a fallout from 28fde3a1 (doc: set actual
> revdate for manpages, 2023-04-13); when it is shown in the patch
> form like this, it is kind of obvious why we need to compensate for
> that change this way, but apparently "doc-diff" slipped everybody's
> mind back then when we were looking at the change.

Yes. doc-diff is an odd duck, because it can't be easily integrated to
the testing framework.

Sometimes a diff in the documentation is intentional, so the fact that
doc-diff generates an output from HEAD~ to HEAD is precisely what was
intended. However, sometimes it's not. Maybe a flag inside the commit
message such as GitHub's `[no ci]` might help, but it's beyond me how
could that be cleanly integrated to continous integration machinery.

For now doc-diff is meant to be run manually, therefore it's expected
that some unexpeced diffs are inevitably going to slip by, and more
relevantly: issues in doc-diff itself are going to slip by.

> Looking at the patch text of 28fde3a1, we pass GIT_VERSION and
> GIT_DATE to AsciiDoc since that version.  We were already covering
> GIT_VERSION by hardcoded "omitted" string, and now we compensate for
> the other one here, which means this change and the other changes
> complement each other, and there shouldn't be a need to further
> adjustment for that change around this area.  Looking good.

Yes. I think we should be passing a semi-real version instead, like
`0.0.0`, just to see how a real version would look like, but that's
orthogonal.

> > diff --git a/Documentation/doc-diff b/Documentation/doc-diff
> > index 1694300e50..554a78a12d 100755
> > --- a/Documentation/doc-diff
> > +++ b/Documentation/doc-diff
> > @@ -153,6 +153,7 @@ render_tree () {
> >  		make -j$parallel -C "$tmp/worktree" \
> >  			$makemanflags \
> >  			GIT_VERSION=omitted \
> > +			GIT_DATE=1970-01-01 \
> >  			SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=0 \
> >  			DESTDIR="$tmp/installed/$dname+" \
> >  			install-man &&
> 
> I wonder what the existing SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH was trying to do there,
> though.

I also wondered the same, but again: orthogonal.

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-08  2:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-03 23:23 [PATCH] doc: doc-diff: specify date Felipe Contreras
2023-05-05  1:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-05  1:46   ` Jeff King
2023-05-05  5:55     ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-05 21:16       ` Jeff King
2023-05-08  2:08   ` Felipe Contreras [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=645859a541f23_4e612944b@chronos.notmuch \
    --to=felipe.contreras@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=git@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=peff@peff$(echo .)net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox